One of the earliest preserved accounts of the linguistic condition in ancient Media in Arabic sources is found in Ibn al Nadim's 10th century work, which quotes an older author, Ibn al Muqaffa (8th century):
'Abd Allah ibn al-Muqaffa' said, "The languages of the Persians are the Pahlawi, the Deri, the Parsi, the Khuzistānī, and the Syriac, The Pahlawi (al-Fahlawiyah) is related to Pahlav (Fahlah), a region which includes five cities: Işbahan, Rayy, Hamadhan, Mah Nahawand, and Adharbayjan. The Deri (al-Durīyah) was the language of the cities of al-Mada'in, spoken at the king's court. It was derived from presence at the court (al-bab), coming chiefly from the language of the people of Khurasan and the East, the speecli of the people of Balkh. Priests, scholars, and their like speak Parsī (al-Farsiyah), the speech of the people of Fars. The kings and nobles used to speak the Khuzistānī (al-Khūzīyah) in privacy, in places of play and amusement, and with their retinues. The people of al-Sawad used to speak Syriac (al-Suriyānīyah), writing in one form of Persian Syriac.
Ibn al Muqaffa's testimony is enigmatic. Much has been said about what the various designations may indicate for Ibn al Muqaffa. The better question is to determine what the plausible scenario on the ground was and how it related to Ibn al Muqaffa's description. A popular but incorrect assumption from the text is that 'pahlavi' was a standardized and uniform dialect or language. This cannot have been the linguistic condition in the eighth century, nor was there a single dialect/language in that region for centuries afterward. The 'pahlavi' label, as a linguistic entity, would be an amalgamation of multiple languages over centuries, many of which would be mutually incomprehensible to speakers of two different languages/dialects in the region. The plot becomes more interesting, but also more difficult, as the ethnic label of the Kurd-label in Arabic sources during the early centuries is considered. Kurdish, as a linguistic entity, was unknown for most of the premodern period and not named as such. The Kurdish language(s) would be placed under other generic labels, Pahlavi being one example.




