"Examining 16th-century Kurdish politics, particularly in the frontier districts between the Ottoman and Safavid Empires, aptly serves as a starting point for understanding Kurdish regional semi-autonomy. This paper, dedicated to the activities of Kurdish individuals involved in information-gathering on behalf of both the Ottoman and the Safavid Empires, is the first of its kind. The findings presented here are the result of close exploration in the Ottoman archives as well as detailed reading of a number of materials from Ottoman and Safavid chronicles. The paper discusses three main subjects. The introductory section briefly explains the methods and potentials of Kurdish spying as well as some of the particulars of Ottoman– Safavid espionage. The second section provides an overview of two famous Kurdish intellectual historians and the role each played in information-gathering. The third section discusses cases of espionage throughout the political careers of several Kurdish frontier emirs."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Why was Suhrawardi executed?
Others, like Ibn Sina and those who followed him, acknowledged prophethood while holding that the world was eternal. But they brought the pr...
Popular posts
-
The association of the house of Mihran with the Kurd-label is found in Ottoman sources, as in the passage from Katib Celebi quoted below: Th...
-
Others, like Ibn Sina and those who followed him, acknowledged prophethood while holding that the world was eternal. But they brought the pr...
-
For a considerable period, Suhraward was a thriving centre that produced a remarkable number of notable personalities, until the Mongols bro...
-
1. Where is the Kurdish Kawa, O chosen one? Fereydun stands in armor, ready for battle.
-
Among the figures who pass through the chronicles of the Mamluk age, few are as difficult to fathom as Shaykh Khidr Mihrani. A Kurdish Sufi ...
No comments:
Post a Comment